Tag: tidal

Brand Strategy Perspective Product design

Turn it up

While streaming music online I commonly turn up the volume on songs I really like. It’s a habit that automatically happens, whether the volume is at its max already or not. If the song is a long time favorite, it takes me just a few seconds to complete this action. For newer songs, the action usually happens mid-way through the song.

Observing this habit made me think, wouldn’t my experience be improved if the music streaming service accounted for these actions? This feature enhancement could boost my music selection by accounting for this typical human interaction.

Algorithms could be created within the music streaming software so that…

– Songs I turn the volume up on would be treated as a favorite.

– The volume could automatically adjust back to a neural volume after a favorite song has completed.

– It may be possible to account for the level I like a song, based on how long it takes me to turn up the volume.

Accounting for human behavior can help us identify new ideas or envision ways to enhance already existing ideas.

What do you do when a song is really good? I turn it up.

I’ve written a few articles on the music streaming industry (follow the links below to read). The perceived competition between Spotify, Pandora, Apple Music, and Tidal, has captured my attention.

6.29.2015: Apple ignites human potential with the launch of Apple Music

6.30.2015: How a brand can have the best product or service and still lose

7.2.2015: Be yourself, it’s the reason we showed up in the first place

8.6.2015: Selling sound

Brand Strategy Perspective

Selling sound

How do you sell sound? I’ve been observing the strategy of a music streaming service, Tidal, that is attempting to do just this.

While they’ve made some adjustments in their brand presentation since I wrote about them here, they are still misguided in their approach of promoting sound quality as the differential between them and their competitors.

The obvious reason that Tidal would try to sell sound quality is because selling screen quality has worked for television and other devices. But, the reality is:

Selling sound quality is not equivalent to selling screen quality.

Referring to science alone, sight is our most dominant sense. That is why we can distinguish between high and low screen quality. We don’t register the difference in sound quality enough to sway our purchase decision.

Considering this, how should Tidal adjust their overall brand strategy?

The tagline…

Current tagline: High Fidelity Music Streaming

The issue: What value does high fidelity add to me as an end user? I am not sure that most people could tell you the difference between high fidelity and the quality of their music now. It is not quantifiable in a way that people can extract value.

Suggested tagline: Flawless Music Streaming or Flawless Music

The quotes…

Current quote: “Forget Spotify. Get CD Quality Music” – Forbes

The issue: On Tidal’s website, there are several quotes that refer to the CD quality of the music. Meaning, Tidal is attempting to position themselves as offering new technology by comparing themselves to old, outdated technology? This takes away value and may be confusing to consumers, some of who may not even know what a CD is or have enough experience listening to them to understand the quality comparison.

Suggested quote: “I’ve never listened to music this flawless.” -Pannsy

Tidal should be inspired, not completely lead, by the sound quality of their music. They are trying to sell sound quality to the masses, when they should be selling to people who want their life, and their music, to be flawless. That is how you sell sound.